Governor’s Office Withdraws Proposal to Move DNPE to DPI
Released:
Dan Gerlach, Senior Advisor
for Fiscal Affairs, Office of the Governor, invited several NC non-public
school organization leaders to the Governor’s Office in
Those present at the April 6
meeting included: Dan Gerlach, the
Governor’s Senior Advisor for Fiscal Affairs; NC Secretary of Administration
Gwynn Swinson; NC Department of Administration
General Counsel Brooks Skinner; NC Division of Non-Public Education Director
Rod Helder; representatives from North Carolinians for Home Education;
representatives from the North Carolina Christian School Association; and,
representatives from the North Carolina Association of Independent Schools.
On
”First, many thanks to
everyone for taking time from their busy schedules to travel to
I explained that the
proposal to transfer the Division of Nonpublic Education from the Department of
Administration to the Department of Public Instruction was a budget-driven, not
a policy-driven, proposal.
Early in the budget process,
the Department of Administration made an expansion budget request - that is, a
request for more money - for staff and related expenses for the Division of
Nonpublic Education. The Division has
three full-time people and the staff has not increased, despite new
responsibilities (such as the driving eligibility certificate program
introduced in 1998) and substantial growth in the number of North Carolinians
choosing nonpublic alternatives to educate their children, notably home
schooling. The number of home schools
has increased from 8,171 in 1995-96 to 28,746 in 2003-04. The budget request was for roughly $150,000.
In recent years, the state
budget has been tight and most agencies have had responsibilities increased
with no new dollars. This is not a
sustainable trend. Any new funding for
some areas has come from cuts in other areas.
The Department of
Administration has two main functions: (a) To undertake the General
Services functions of government - maintain state property, oversee state
construction, take care of the motor vehicle pool, provide utilities, etc.;
and, (b) Provide the home for a variety of functions that do not fit easily in
other departments such as the Division of Nonpublic Education, Veterans
Affairs, Advocacy for People with Disabilities, Indian Affairs, etc. Budget cuts have all come from the general
services side, as policymakers do not want to cut funding for the divisions
that serve constituencies that are growing.
Frankly, the Department now has shortfalls in some of its general
services areas and more cannot be reduced without jeopardizing core services.
For this reason, our thought
was to move the Division of Nonpublic Education to DPI. DPI is a much larger agency, and we felt that
it would be easier to find and re-deploy existing resources there to help
administer the current law. The
expansion in staff is NOT due to any desire on the part of anyone in the
Administration nor DPI to change policy, but to deal with increased
responsibilities and caseload described above.
Obviously, this decision to
advance this proposal has caused substantial concern. I confess to insensitivity to this concern,
and apologize for it. The decision was a
budget one, not pushed by Secretary Swinson nor by DPI.
The Easley Administration
will not push the proposal further to transfer the Division to DPI. At the request of several who attended the
meeting, I have already personally communicated this to Senator David Hoyle, a
key legislator on the General Government Appropriations Subcommittee. Senator Hoyle agrees that the transfer should
not be done. But, the status quo of
three staff is not sustainable, nor can Secretary Swinson's department find the
money elsewhere in her department.
We discussed several ways to
improve efficiency - including use of web-based solutions, the use of the
nonpublic school organizations to disseminate information, and so forth - and
ways to increase resources - including examination of policies used in other
states and the possibility of legislative support for additional
appropriations. The nonpublic school
organizations agreed to think about solutions to the current challenge. All the nonpublic school organizations agreed
that the transfer to DPI was not appropriate.
There was discussion about
ways to keep dialogue open and increase input from the nonpublic school
community, and we welcome that dialogue.
Many concerned citizens shared their views with the Governor's Office
and the Department of Administration two weeks ago. We appreciate hearing from taxpayers about
their concerns because this is
There was also discussion
about the good job that the Division does right now and that the current law is
one of the better ones in the nation.
To summarize, the Governor's
Office will inform legislators that the proposal to shift the Division to DPI
is no longer part of our budget proposal and is not an appropriate solution;
the nonpublic school organizations will offer input on how to ensure that the
current law can be carried out effectively and efficiently; and, we will all
keep lines of communication open.”